CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Who exactly is holding White Collar’s Kate?

- Season 1, Episode 5 - "The Portrait"

White Collar s01e05 - The Portrait

Is anyone else starting to wonder whether Kate, the love of Neal Caffrey’s life, might be trying to pull the proverbial wool over Neal’s eyes all by herself? I mean, let’s be realistic here: the guy’s put her through hell, he got sentenced to four years in prison at a time when most couples would be thinking of marriage, and he lied to her about where he hid his stash. Doesn’t that scream scorned lover?

It seems like just a bit too elaborate of a plot for her simply to be trying to send messages to him on behalf of the guy with the ring who appears to be holding her captive. And she needs the location of all of the loot so he can get one item that Neal held onto? Wake up, Caffrey! Methinks you might be getting played.

I was a bit disappointed with this week’s episode of White Collar. Not that it was bad, or anything like that, but I definitely felt unsatisfied by the end. Sure, Neal’s altruistic, and a great person … why not? But the case-of-the-week wasn’t so intriguing, nor was it complicated. Although I did like how Caffrey went about screwing the museum curator who’d screwed that lady out of her inheritance. But one sweet move does not a good episode make.

I think it was also the aesthetics of the episode itself. Most of the entire first few minutes — from Caffrey and Burke on the roof to the scene of the robbery — looked like they were shot horribly. And every subsequent scene in the car with Neal and Peter, at least while it was moving, had the same subpar feel to it. You’d think a successful show wouldn’t move backwards budget-wise. Even if these first five episodes were all shot in one batch, they should at least be the same as one another, unless of course the producers ran out of money by episode five. In any event, something was majorly off.

I also don’t expect Burke to be 100% onboard with Neal, considering their history together, but taking into account the recent capers they’ve teamed up on, I do expect Burke to have a bit more confidence in Caffrey even if he is a confidence man. It’s a theme that is clearly going to wind its way through the entire series, but one that I can definitely do without.

Nevertheless, I did find myself, as usual, enjoying the chemistry that the two leads have together. The interplay, the easy bantering, and the shared thought-processes all work together to make this a very enjoyable team to watch in action. And nothing is perfect every time out of the gate; that I accept. But I’ve come to expect more from USA Network shows, the possible source for a lot of my frustration throughout season two of In Plain Sight. I guess I’d never felt that Burn Notice or Psych struggled to find their respective voices after establishing them in their inaugural seasons, so I therefore expect excellence from their siblings in every episode.

Which isn’t a bad thing either, nor do I believe it’s holding a show up to unreasonable expectations. It’s just calling a spade a spade: great show, great network, great characters … that should produce never-ending great episodes. All I’m interested in is enjoying these series.

So, no pressure White Collar. Just keep that in mind for next week.

Photo Credit: USA Network

25 Responses to “Who exactly is holding White Collar’s Kate?”

November 22, 2009 at 2:39 PM

There’s a lot to be said for shows that involve someone helping out the little guy that just got screwed over by the big guy, especially in today’s economy and world as we know it.
This show is fun, and to me, that is all that matters. And the fun is catchy, and the people doing it seem to be having fun in their rolls. Nothing wrong with that.
Good review! Super ep!! GREAT show!!!

November 23, 2009 at 9:22 AM

I agree — I think Kate is pulling the con, but I don’t agree that this was a stinky episode. I enjoyed it as much as all the others, and I really liked the case, but I’m a sucker for an art heist.

November 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM

“I’m a sucker for an art heist”

Is that a thing? :)

November 23, 2009 at 5:01 PM

HA! It’s totally a thing. Like the Leverage episode where they steal the painting, or The Thomas Crown Affair (OK, not the most exciting example). I think it’s the Art History major in me, combined with my freakish love for any heist, con or otherwise clever thievery.

November 24, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Interesting; logically I’d think art majors would revile art heist’s, forgeries, and frauds. Who knew? :)

Did you catch Aldis Hodge on last week’s The Forgotten?

And I loved Thomas Crown!

November 23, 2009 at 10:06 AM

“There’s a lot to be said for shows that involve someone helping out the little guy that just got screwed over by the big guy”

I’m definitely with you on that; I just didn’t see it coming from Caffrey. But I did enjoy it.

November 22, 2009 at 2:40 PM

Duh me, make that ‘roles’……where the hell is that style book when I need it?

November 22, 2009 at 5:26 PM

I also think that Kate is pulling a con. The whole setup smells fishy.

As to Peter not trusting Neal – why should he? They have only worked a few cases together and the majority of Peter’s experience with him has been as a thief and a con artist.

November 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM

While you’re definitely right in saying why should Peter trust Neal, and I think he would have to have been an idiot to let him out of prison without the ankle monitor and other precautions, he also let him out of prison to work with him. How can the two work together if every week Peter’s going to wonder whether Caffrey’s running, or if he’s pulling a con, or if he stole something, or whatever? He can’t trust his advice and guidance but keep him completely locked in a box of suspicion. I’m just saying I think that that’s unsustainable.

November 23, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Haven’t you ever heard the saying “The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function” (F. Scott Fitzgerald)? :) Not strictly applicable to the situation, but analogous, and I do think that Burke is that intelligent.

Or as he put it, “Trust, but verify.”

November 23, 2009 at 2:37 PM

In fact, I have not. :)

In its purest sense, I’m not sure what that’s meant to look like, but I think Burke is more black and white than that in dealing with Caffrey. First “he stole something,” then, “what the hell, let him go get that information for us.” Maybe it’s meant to seem like an internal struggle, which could work. In which case, it needs some refinement.

January 29, 2010 at 3:17 PM

Hello – it’s a tv show; not a real life situation. It’s in the script!

November 23, 2009 at 8:20 AM

Other than Mozzie who totally rocks, the best part of this show these days are the Burn Notice commercials.

November 28, 2009 at 2:17 AM

So I just finished watching this weeks episode of white collar. Neil is getting closer to finding out who has kate. Now he knows that an FBI persons has kate, anybody have any idea who it is?

November 29, 2009 at 2:33 PM

I’m guessing, if it’s even true, that it’s someone we’ve yet to meet.

December 4, 2009 at 11:03 PM

Peter has Kate! Who else is shocked!?

December 5, 2009 at 1:15 AM

I’m shocked!! How are they gonna explain this? Are Pete and Kate in something together? Is there a Peter double? Whats with the ring? Why is Kate walking around all by herself coming and going at will? Is Peter really a bad guy or is he just working on something super duper top secret? What gives?

December 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM

I disagree, I think Peter, although not dirty, has some dark secret from his past. He is just too good at what he does, almost as good as Neil, meaning that he probably was like Neil at one point it time and needs the one thing that can prove who he really is or was. As for the ring, it’s most likely some crucial clue that Neil keeps overlooking. If he focuses on that ring all the answers will become clear.

December 9, 2009 at 10:32 AM

Interesting about Peter and the ring … so how would he have avoided the FBI’s background checks? Or the deep research that Neal likely did on him while he was evading him? That could be a really intriguing angle.

December 6, 2009 at 3:07 PM

i think that peter wants to put neil away for every crime he has committed. because when kate called him on the phone booth at central station she asked for the money and paintings and stuff saying the man with the ring wants something. but that doesnt seem like something peter would do. i almost think there is someone else pulling the strings. and i totally agree with sean: why cant kate go to neil-she can walk around anywhere she wants and cant go to him??

December 6, 2009 at 3:29 PM

I know Peter isn’t a bad guy but he has been very good at staying secretive. plus i don’t think elizabeth knows or she would’ve told Neil because she wouldn’t let this fly. And if Peter wanted to put Neil away why did he let the guy from OPR do it they had him for 10 years minimum on the diamond. This is a really good series though so I cant wait until January.

December 10, 2009 at 8:36 PM

woah this is some crazy shit man i wonder if that fowler guy was trying to help Kate by bugging peters house and that hes the good guy and peters the bad dude

January 20, 2010 at 4:14 PM

I guess I was pretty close with Peter’s wife! I probably just saw the ring on the wrong hand, but it does make me enjoy the series more. It has been a bit of a let down these last episodes, the big my-friend-the-fbi-dude-turns-out-to-be-evil plot is a bit too simple for me, I expect more from a series with some great characters

January 21, 2010 at 12:01 PM

You were. Great catch in episode two!

Powered By OneLink