CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

The Deep End is pretty shallow

Bob posed an interesting question earlier today: do you miss FlashForward. Without getting into my original answer, after watching tonight’s pilot episode of The Deep End I can tell you this — I’m definitely feeling its absence right now.

I won’t say that I was overly excited about The Deep End going in, but I was intrigued, given the fact that I enjoy legal series, and that I got a good vibe from Ivey’s preview. And, spoiler alert for all those of you who bought into the comparison (not Ivey’s, but apparently everyone else’s) — this show is nothing like Grey’s Anatomy.

In fact, if I was forced to make a comparison, the only one I could come up with is that Matt Long’s Dylan Hewitt visually reminds me of Kerr Smith’s turn as Paul Robbins on Eli Stone … not a blight you want on a new show.

But that’s far from this show’s only problem. The Deep End’s hook is clearly meant to be its characters, so why do they all suck? Dylan is shockingly naive for someone who would have had to be a summer associate at a huge law firm during his years in law school in order to land this job. Matt Long’s Jack McCallister charm is not going to carry him through here.

Addy (Tina Majorino from Big Love) herself would have never made it out of those two summers as an associate during school. But had she survived, she would know full well what was expected of her as a first-year associate. She acts as if she’s the first first-year to be run into the ground. And that it’s somehow inappropriate for her to be expected to succeed. Majorino needs to leave the Mormon back in Utah.

Liam (Ben Lawson) was okay. Slimy, but you’d expect at least some lawyers to be like that. Except he won’t lie … not that he should, but that totally cracked his facade as a believable person, considering everything else about him. Even so he could be tolerable, if not for the Scrubs-like relationship he appears set to have with Beth (Leah Pipes) — think Lucy and Cole.

Beth, of course, is the other first-year who’s been there for 10 days, who is somehow indispensible on a matter that’s probably been at the firm for many years. Right. Oh, and she’s Lindsay from season one of The Practice, with a father/mentor at a bigger law firm who disapproves of the direction she’s taken her career. Awesome.

Look, The Deep End could very well develop into something great. And I will be tuning in next week to watch it. But this is no legal drama — this is a soap opera-like vehicle set in a law firm. Which is why, in part, this show is nothing like Grey’s Anatomy … there’s been medicine practiced at Seattle Grace from day one. So far at Sterling there’s just intrigue.

Married couple/managing partner and head of litigation Cliff (Billy Zane) and Susan (Nicole Ari Parker) promise nothing but eye-rolling drama, and not just because Cliff is sleeping with Katie (Rachelle Lefevre), whose chemistry with Dylan I did enjoy. Hart Sterling’s (Clancy Brown) return is obviously meant to be disruptive, but to me he just seemed dumb, and completely unaware of what running a law firm entails.

I was impressed by the guest casting, and I’m sure we can count on a lot more familiar faces going forward. Bottom line though, overall I was as disappointed as I could have been without going into the pilot with a lot of expectations. Hopefully next week will show me something light-years better. Otherwise, I guess I’ll now be counting down to FlashForward’s return.

Photo Credit: ABC

Categories: | Episode Reviews | General | TV Shows |

8 Responses to “The Deep End is pretty shallow”

January 22, 2010 at 8:17 AM

watching Deep end made me miss Eli Stone so much

FlashForward too

I will watch the second episode and made my mind from there because I promise myself to never make a final idea of a serie on the pilot

will see

January 22, 2010 at 10:03 AM

Me too. I was hoping it would have some of that Eli Stone vibe, but without the right cast….

January 22, 2010 at 11:21 PM

First off, excellent article Aryeh, for the most part I could not agree with you more (probably the only part I disagree on is me thinking The Deep End does have a lot in common with Grey’s, ofcourse I dislike Grey’s so I might be biased a bit).

Secondly, I don’t think it’s the cast that is the problem here. They have several good actors/actresses and one great actress (Tina) to carry the show. The problem for me was the script and really the whole setup of the show. They advertise this as the new legal drama, but in reality there is barely any “legal action” going on and the little bits we do see are aimed at the intelligence level of the mentally challenged.
I mean, Mr. Genius Naive Hero Lawyer looks over the data again and just happens to find the perfect solution to solve the case? Or before that, when presenting his new “brilliant” argument to the judge and the judge doesn’t wanna go with it he just conveniently remembers the judge about something he did years ago, ending that conversation with such a cliché line it made my toes curl up to my ankles. This is the sort of bad represention of the legal system you’d expect in the aforementioned soap opera, not from a “legal drama” on one of major networks.

Ofcourse it wouldn’t seem half as bad if there weren’t so many GOOD legal dramas being made these last few years: Eli Stone, The Closer, Drop Dead Diva and the best of all, The Good Wife.

I, for one, will not be watching this dribble again and will instead offer prayer for a return of Eli Stone instead. To think ABC canceled Eli Stone and then brings us this…

January 24, 2010 at 9:33 AM

Yeah, the lack of “legal” in the drama was extremely disappointing. As silly as Boston Legal was at times, there was a lot of law on it. Can’t that be done again?

January 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM

But did it make you long for FlashForward?…

January 22, 2010 at 12:04 PM

I agree with your review. It doesn’t seem likely that first year lawyers who have only been with the firm for 10 days would be working on important cases. However, if we go back to the discussion in your Criminal Minds review are we over analysing things. Perhaps this show is best viewed with an open mind – just sit back and enjoy the ride.

January 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM

True here too, but there also needs to be a certain amount of authenticity that we should be able to expect from shows these days. With the number of advisers, as well as all the publicly available information, shows should be accurate at least as far as simple things are concerned. I can see totally letting going watching fantasy, or science fiction, but a show set in a law firm should resemble a law firm, no? :)

Powered By OneLink