NCIS is without question an established juggernaut. I don’t know that it ever wasn’t highly rated, but certainly in recent years it’s been riding high as one of the most, if not the most watched show on television at any given point in time.
And yet I’m beginning to wonder … I haven’t really been thrilled by the show of late. Not that I’m disappointed in the episodes it’s churning out, but talk about cases that barely hold my interest. I’m not even sure I remember who-dun-it last night.
I’m okay with the show only really flexing its muscle when it comes to character development. But sometimes there’s barely any movement, which leaves us where exactly? Obviously the team is always a part of the episode, but their lives aren’t necessarily explored every week.
I was thankful that Tony was back to normal this time. The truth is that his going on as if nothing happened makes last episode stand out even more as odd, because not only did it come out of nowhere but it also seems to have left no lingering effects on Tony. So what was the point?
I’m surprised that Federal law enforcement agencies would have such a thing as comp time off in place of monetarily compensating agents for overtime. How could they not be working copious amounts of overtime? And therefore how could agents possibly take all the time off that they’d be due in that system, as Tony so rightly pointed out? It seems crazy.
By the way, I really liked the brief “murder mystery” thing that Tony did on the boat when he was talking to the passengers who’d been detained. That was fun.
I didn’t follow the theory that the dead guy had severed ties with his family when he’d become a Marine, that he’d turned his back on his family and the family business. Had they actually established that then fine, but how would one draw that conclusion based on the fact that he’d signed up to serve his country? Who’s to say he didn’t plan to serve his tour of duty, go to college, and then join the company? It might seem insignificant, but that premise was part of the starting point for the investigation. It made no sense to me, and it kind of surprised me that the team would make that huge a leap.
Plus, had he severed ties with the company he wouldn’t have been in the position to make any provisions in his will whatsoever that pertained to the company. Clearly he was the man in charge, and he would only have had that kind of authority if he was meant to return to run the company. I realize that popped up at the end, but it kind of shoots the theory that he turned his back on his family to hell.
I suppose I should mention the reappearance of Diane Neal as Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) Special Agent Abigail Borin … then again, she wasn’t very good, so why bother? I liked her blind date, Steve Melman. How could matchmaking friends — or others — lock them at sea on a blind date? Seems cruel to me.
Overall, not a great episode. In fact, season eight hasn’t been one of the better seasons of NCIS. But next week’s always a clean slate, right?
Yeah, sorry, sir, I disagree. I enjoyed Borin and her dynamic with Gibbs. Seemed less forced than Mann (And I’m a fan of Thompson).
*POST AUTHOR*
Her “twin-ness” with Gibbs seems forced, fake, and poorly orchestrated. It’s like they’re telling us “this is female Gibbs” instead of showing us — and that’s ignoring the fact that they’re nothing alike. :)
Mann’s weird, but the nature of her relationship with Gibbs is really different from Borin’s.
Hey A,
I hate to do it, but I agree with D.W. While I disliked Mann, I enjoyed Borin. But, this time around I wasn’t as crazy about her. Having every character say ‘you’re just like Gibbs’ seemed forced. I’d rather the script show us. They did a better job at Borin’s introduction, but at this point I don’t think the ‘you’re just like Gibbs’ references were as necessary (considering they aren’t establishing the character – just continuing her).
This felt like a total throwaway episode and I would’ve preferred if they just had Abby/Tony/whoever on the boast instead.
You hate to agree with me?
I’m … I … Uh ….
I think I’ll just go cry somewhere.
*POST AUTHOR*
I think she was saying because she’d just slammed my Good Wife review as well. But if you need a good cry…. ;)
Considering the series-high 22 million viewers figure posted by “NCIS” last night, it would seem that many people don’t agree with yet another downer review here.
*POST AUTHOR*
Wouldn’t they have tuned in before discovering whether it was a good episode or not?
Maybe, but they would have turned it off if they didn’t like it.
*POST AUTHOR*
When do the people with the boxes input their viewership?
In my experience, ratings are generally done every quarter hour, and then are averaged for the reported numbers.
*POST AUTHOR*
Maybe the show’s a favorite of heavy drinkers?…. Too hard to change the channel?
No, I watched the entire thing, and I always would. I’m just saying this one misfired, but that won’t stop me from tuning in next week.
Again I have to ask… why are writers who obviously are not fans of the shows doing these recaps?
*POST AUTHOR*
I’m pretty sure that’s generally not the case. Personally I’m a big fan of NCIS; are you not allowed to criticize a show you like when you think they’ve done a bad job? That would seem like an odd requirement for a reviewer, no?