CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Seinfeld – CliqueClack Flashback

feature

michael_richardsCosmo Kramer: Michael Richards reveals something interesting in one of the many interviews that he did for the various DVD sets. He said that, in the beginning, he decided to play Kramer as being slightly ahead of everyone else. Richards would be so fully prepared with the script, and all the unique stories and plot-points, that he was running a few steps ahead of the rest of the cast. As the show progressed, and the character evolved, he decided to play Kramer as being behind everyone else. Richards wouldn’t read any more of the script than he needed to in order to deliver his lines. The result? Well, I don’t know about the first idea, but the second made Kramer into one of the most iconic characters in television history.

Kramer’s comedy stems only slightly from the lines that others wrote for him. The majority of the laughs that he got for nine seasons came from Richards’ innate knowledge of physical comedy, the area that the actor actually specialized in. The entrances, the hand motions, the hair, the clothing, the catchphrases (or, rather, words and sounds), all were Richards’ originals. The real Kenny Kramer gave little more to the character Kramer than a last name, and a residence across the hall from the main character on the show (the real Kramer was actually a neighbor of Larry David’s).

What we all found so intriguing about Kramer was his ability to live a life. Out of work until his bagel shop met his demands (halfway through season nine, a brilliant bombshell that was a totally believable out-of-nowhere plot point), Kramer somehow managed to rent an apartment (a sublet from Paul Reiser’s character on Mad About You), feed and clothe himself, and date countless women (the one main character on the show who you could really believe would lead that kind of vapid lifestyle.)

There are so many classic Kramer moments from the show, that it’s impossible to name but a few: the lack of a first name through season five (and Cosmo was not a letdown), fantasy baseball camp, the Kavorka, his long-distance relationship with a girl downtown, Darren the intern and Kramerica Industries, the holistic healer, his karate class, shaving with butter, his hot tub, the non-job office job, the coffee table book about coffee tables, the “bro”, The Real Peterman Reality Bus Tour, the shower garbage disposal, The Merv Griffin Show set, the screen door, rickshaws, the bottle recycling scheme, the giant rubber ball full of oil, sponsoring a stretch of highway, and saving a bus full of people from a highjacker. The list of Kramer classics is endless.

Seinfeld provided plenty of guest and supporting characters, as well. Some highlights:

Frank Costanza: While the role was originated by John Randolph, Jerry Stiller really built the character from the ground up. Frank is so crazy, and yet, all the work that Stiller put in to create a three-dimensional person, makes Frank authentic. There’s little doubt that Frank is in large part responsible for the man that George became, and I love him for that. His collection of TV Guides, creation of Festivus, silent feud with the Seinfelds, Serenity Now, fear of cooking, and hundreds of other things, make Frank Costanza the worst father, and yet the perfect one.

Estelle Costanza: Estelle Harris did a great job of making an undesirable character watchable. I’m not a big fan, and never will be, but I love that I will always have the sound of her saying “Georgie” in my head.

Newman: Wayne Knight portrayed the somewhat unhinged mailman. Also not one of my favorites, but the show, and specifically Jerry and Kramer, would never have been as great without him. And I love when George asks him what he actually does for a living.

Morty and Helen Seinfeld: I’m not sure why, but I also never got on board with these two. I definitely preferred Barney Martin to Phil Bruns, who originally played Morty, but I was always hoping they’d be less irritating, and more funny. Helen (Liz Sheridan) was too much of a nagger. Something tells me that Jerry’s real parents are a lot like these two.

Uncle LeoLen Lesser knows how to do comedy right, and he continued his chops on Everybody Loves Raymond. “Hello, Uncle Leo!”

J. Peterman (John O’Hurley) was a nut, George Steinbrenner (Larry David) was absolutely brilliant, Mr. Pitt (Ian Abercrombie) was just about as funny as a Brit (the actor is; was the character?) in his generation could possibly be, Tim Whatley was Bryan Cranston at his early ripeness, Mr. and Mrs. Ross (Warren Frost and Grace Zabriskie) were one of those couples who’ve clearly eaten away at one another over the life of their marriage, The Soup Nazi (Larry Thomas) was offensive and hilarious, all at the same time, Lloyd Braun became an instant classic post-nuthouse, Izzy Mandelbaum (Lloyd Bridges) was someone’s brilliant cross between a Jewish grandfather and Jack LaLanne, Joe Temple (Robert Hooks) played a role in a quintessentially “George” story, Mr. Kruger (Daniel von Bargen) was a perfect snapshot of where George was heading in life, Lt. Bookman (Philip Baker Hall) gave the greatest speech about anything, in this case library books, that I’ve ever heard, and the little seen Maitre d’ (James Hong) in the Chinese restaurant, had me rolling on the floor.

Finally, I would be doing a disservice to this great show were I not to mention Larry David. While I’m no fan of him as an actor or as a comedian, it’s impossible to appreciate Seinfeld without acknowledging the enormous role that David played in its success. While knowing absolutely nothing about running a show when they started, Larry David, along with Jerry Seinfeld, created a masterpiece of television that is unlikely to ever be matched. There are a lot of comparisons to be made between Seinfeld and Everybody Loves Raymond, but, as much as I love it, the latter never reached the heights that Larry and Jerry drove Seinfeld to.

You can hear their passion in the joint episode commentaries that they sporadically did on the DVDs; while Ray Romano and Phil Rosenthal are so busy telling jokes that they barely notice when an episode ends (which is totally in character, and I truly enjoy it), David and Seinfeld remember every minute detail from each and every day on set. They discuss guest actresses who made five second appearances with so much information, you can tell just how much of themselves they gave to the show for nine seasons (David for seven). Kudos to them both on a job exceedingly well done.

In the end, upon watching the series finale for a second time after viewing every episode, I was finally able to appreciate just what the show was trying to do. There was no finite closure to be had, so, instead, they went with the only thing available to them: absurdity. The trial was merely a vehicle, to allow us viewers to revisit the countless characters who paraded across the landscape of the show for 180 episodes. While it left me feeling like there could easily be a reunion or a movie (come on!), the conclusion was really a brilliant move.

I believe that it’s also worth noting Jerry Seinfeld’s ego in praising the show. I don’t want to get into anything negative about him, but from the little that is known publicly, were it not for his insistence on keeping the enormous proceeds from the show close to the vest, we would have never been graced with the DVD collection, a move pushed for by Alexander, Louis-Dreyfus, and Richards, who were merely looking to get their due.

I don’t care who made what; I’m just glad I have my Seinfeld to turn to, whenever the mood strikes. The show is absolutely awesome!

Photo Credit: NBC

16 Responses to “Seinfeld – CliqueClack Flashback”

June 24, 2009 at 6:01 PM

I’m not the world’s biggest Seinfeld fan, but I feel as if people praise Seinfeld way too much. There are some very memorable episodes to me (ugly baby! George not willing to give up a parking space, the Chinese restaurant!). But, to be honest, the show is a particular type of comedy that simply appeals to vapid individuals.

June 24, 2009 at 6:32 PM

You seem to be calling yourself a fan to a certain extent; does that make you vapid like us? :-)

June 24, 2009 at 10:13 PM

To a certain degree, yes. It’s just that all of the characters on Seinfeld are basically shallow and are all about themselves. That kind of unwavering selfishness reflects on its viewers. That’s the chord the show struck; the selfish fuck in all of us.

June 24, 2009 at 10:48 PM

That’s specifically the dissection that I was trying to avoid. We could argue forever about the merits of the characters as people. It’s just not worth it to me. I enjoy them for being funny, and for the purposes of this discussion, that’s good enough for me. I don’t think it says anything negative about us for not judging them.

June 24, 2009 at 6:02 PM

Romano owes his success to David Letterman and “Home Improvement” started in ’91 while Seinfeld started in ’90, not much paving ‘o the way there if you ask me, but you have a point. You know I’d most likely phrase it that way myself but usually someone comes out of the woodwork and calls me out on my absolutes so here I am *dusts himself off of all the pine tree needles* ;-)

June 24, 2009 at 6:31 PM

I’m not attempting to draw straight lines here, but Jerry Seinfeld was definitely the test case for comedians going straight from night clubs to primetime. For that reason, the next generation owes him a debt of gratitude.

And, not that it makes such a huge difference, but The Seinfeld Chronicles premiered in July of 1989, over two years prior to Home Improvement’s September, 1991, premiere.

… dumps the pine tree needles all over Sebastian … (what the hell are we talking about?)

June 24, 2009 at 7:40 PM

Whatever, I was thinking about how dopeheads are planting cannabis in national forests ;-)

See I knew you had more up your sleeve and of course you are right about this. But let me throw something back at you: Bill Cosby. Kevin Pollak said he’d been listening to Cosby’s standup records when he was a kid, acting as if he was Cosby (what’s that called? Adlibing? Pollak mentioned it, I’m too lazy to listen to 30 hours of podcasts again to find it). I just think that there were standup comics before Seinfeld who paved the way, even though they were less Successful. Cosby Show started in ’84.

OH and I hope you’ve seen

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0500140/

It’s really good.

June 24, 2009 at 8:29 PM

I’m glad you mentioned both things that you did! :-)

I own “I’m Telling You for the Last Time” on DVD, and once had it on CD, before a friend absconded with it, so I also have the tracks on my iPod. It’s awesome, and we will come back to it momentarily.

I also saw “Comedian” in some tiny theater in The Village (NY). Only people who like him appreciated it, which is to say that I loved it.

Anyway, I’m really glad you brought up Cosby. Bill Cosby was, and is, definitely a standup. However, he blazed the frontier for a different group of people: comedic actors. Back in Cosby’s day, you had to do standup in order to break into acting. So we had Steve Martin, and his brethren, who started out in the clubs, because that was the only way into funny roles. Cosby was actually on many things, including “I Spy”, “The Bill Cosby Show”, “The Electric Company”, and “Fat Albert”, to name a few, before “The Cosby Show”. By then he was an actor, and an accomplished one.

Whereas, Seinfeld blazed a path for all the guys who showed up at the cemetery in the opening of “I’m Telling You for the Last Time”. Yes, I know that someone like George Carlin was already established, but my point is that those guys, his contemporaries, were the comedians who scratched their way into acting, not comedic actors. That’s who Romano and Reiser (who was at the cemetery) were.

“Seinfeld” was really the beginning of an interesting decade of the networks giving shows to comedians who, by and large, did not have the comedic intellect of Seinfeld, Romano, Reiser, and others. The most recent iteration of the experiment is the “Sarah Silverman Program”.

June 24, 2009 at 10:18 PM

I’m sure that Seinfeld paved the way for comedians to be the driving forces of their sitcoms…. however, you claim that Paul Reiser and Ray Romano lack comedic intellect. “Mad About You” mined its humor between a couple’s relationship, whereas, “Everybody Loves Raymond” took on the complexities of a family dynamic. The shows are all different and cannot just be lumped into a general category, as you seem wont to do.

June 24, 2009 at 10:44 PM

Sorry, but I’m specifically saying that Seinfeld, Romano, and Reiser are the ones with the high comedic IQ.

And, I’m not lumping anything into one category, other than shows helmed by standups. Check the Flashback category; I wrote a glowing post on Everybody Loves Raymond, too.

June 25, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Ah yes you are right – I forgot that Cosby was well established – even more so I think his I Spy role fell together with “Shaft” and the rise of the Afro-American Cinema, right?

I’m sorry that I’m not “fluent” in these things, that was before I was born and I still proud myself for staying up till 0:30am for 9 years to watch every single episode of cheers – which ran opposite of “Frasier” during that time of day, followed by “Mad about you” and “Home Improvement” til 2am. Yes that was during my schooldays :-)

June 25, 2009 at 2:52 PM

I actually don’t know much about “I Spy”, other than that it existed, was successful, and helped boost Cosby’s career. :-) Could be.

I’m certainly not fluent either. Just a combination of things you pick up over the years when its of interest to you, and research.

You watched every episode of Cheers? I never got that show….

June 26, 2009 at 12:46 PM

I’m a comedy nut. Ok I have to admit I watch almost everything else that’s good too but I’m really into comedy shows. I’m still pissed “Help Me Help You” didn’t get picked up for another season… but then again that might’ve prevented Ted Danson from playing the role of Arthur Frobisher on “Damages” so there’s a bright side there too…

But of course there are better comedy shows. “Frasier” still is at the top for me. Insanely funny show.

I never liked Seinfeld in its original run on german TV but got into it later on. I simply couldn’t get past all those “coincidences” – Ken Levine wrote about breaking the 4th wall recently on his blog and shared the insight that this is something that is established on the show therefor it’s ok (just like on “Curb your Enthousiasm” which I loathe because of those happenstances too).

Anyway I’m rambling I guess :-) I liked this post, just wanted to add that as a final note. You write too much about too many bad shows so this was a welcome change for you I guess ;-)

June 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM

I lucked into doing flashbacks on most of my favorites. It’s a nice opportunity to look back on real quality stuff!

June 25, 2009 at 7:51 AM

my apologies for misreading.

Powered By OneLink